Galaxy S24 FE Vs iPhone 16

Galaxy S24 FE
Galaxy S24 FE
Starting at

Refurbished price:329.00

Versus €991.15 new

See options
iPhone 16
iPhone 16
Starting at

Refurbished price:549.00

Versus €879.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, released in October 2024, and the Apple iPhone 16, launched in September 2024, represent two distinct approaches to modern smartphone design and functionality. While both devices offer robust performance and advanced camera systems, they cater to different user preferences through their respective operating systems and hardware philosophies. The Galaxy S24 FE runs on Android, providing a customizable experience, whereas the iPhone 16 operates on iOS, known for its integrated ecosystem and streamlined interface.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of a smartphone, factors such as software support and physical resilience are key. Both the iPhone 16 and the Galaxy S24 FE are designed with durability in mind, but their software longevity and repairability aspects present some differences.

  • Software Support: The iPhone 16, running iOS 18 at launch, typically receives major iOS updates for approximately 5-6 years from its release, extending its functional lifespan. The Galaxy S24 FE, launched with Android 14, offers an impressive commitment of 7 years of Android OS upgrades and security updates, providing extended software longevity.
  • Physical Durability: The iPhone 16 features a Ceramic Shield front cover and an aluminum frame, contributing to its resilience against drops and scratches. The Galaxy S24 FE incorporates Gorilla Glass Victus+ for screen protection and an aluminum frame. Both devices carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing submersion up to 6 meters for 30 minutes.
  • Repairability: While specific repairability scores can vary, Apple and Samsung generally offer comprehensive repair services. Users seeking a quality-assured refurbished option for either device can benefit from extended product life and reduced environmental impact.

Year of Release

2024

2024

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from navigating applications to engaging in demanding activities like gaming. Both the iPhone 16 and the Galaxy S24 FE are equipped with powerful internal components designed to deliver a smooth user experience.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone 16 is powered by Apple's A18 chip, which provides enhanced processing capabilities for demanding applications and efficient multitasking. The Galaxy S24 FE utilizes Samsung's Exynos 2400e processor, offering robust performance for everyday use and gaming.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices come with 8 GB of RAM, facilitating smooth transitions between multiple open applications. The iPhone 16 offers storage options of 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB, while the Galaxy S24 FE also provides 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB variants, catering to different storage needs.
  • Battery Endurance: The iPhone 16 is equipped with a 3561 mAh battery, providing up to 22 hours of offline video playback and generally lasting a full day for moderate users. The Galaxy S24 FE features a larger 4700 mAh battery, often delivering up to 1.5 days of usage or around 7 hours of screen-on time with mixed use, and supports 25W wired and 15W wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 FE offer high-quality viewing experiences with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Size: The iPhone 16 features a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Galaxy S24 FE boasts a larger 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, offering an expansive viewing area.
  • Resolution and Brightness: The iPhone 16 provides a resolution of 2556x1179 pixels with approximately 460 pixels per inch (ppi), and can reach up to 2000 nits peak outdoor brightness. The Galaxy S24 FE offers a 1080 x 2340 pixel resolution with a pixel density of around 385 ppi and a peak brightness of 1900 nits.
  • Refresh Rate: The iPhone 16 maintains a 60Hz refresh rate, providing a consistent visual experience. In contrast, the Galaxy S24 FE features a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, which contributes to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1179 x 2556

Screen type

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Super Retina XDR OLED

Audiovisual

Both the iPhone 16 and the Galaxy S24 FE are equipped with advanced camera systems capable of capturing high-quality photos and videos, though they differ in their configurations and specific features.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The iPhone 16 features a dual-camera setup with a 48MP Fusion Main sensor that also enables 2x optical-quality telephoto shots, and a 12MP Ultrawide lens. The Galaxy S24 FE offers a versatile triple-camera system, including a 50MP Main sensor, a 12MP Ultrawide lens, and an 8MP Telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom.
  • Photography Features: The iPhone 16 includes features like Photonic Engine, Smart HDR 5, and a new Camera Control button for quick access and adjustments. The Galaxy S24 FE's camera system is noted for its decent performance in various lighting conditions, with its telephoto lens offering good zoom capabilities for its class.
  • Video Recording: Both devices support 4K video recording at up to 60 frames per second. The Galaxy S24 FE can also record 8K video at 30 frames per second, offering higher resolution video capture.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several other features contribute to the overall user experience and practical utility of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 FE support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.3, ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections. Both devices have adopted a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, with the Galaxy S24 FE supporting USB 3.2 Gen 1 speeds and the iPhone 16 supporting USB 2.0 speeds.
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone 16 relies on Face ID for secure facial recognition. The Galaxy S24 FE features an optical in-screen fingerprint sensor for biometric authentication.
  • Design and Handling: The iPhone 16 has dimensions of 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm and weighs 170 grams, offering a compact and lightweight feel. The Galaxy S24 FE is slightly larger and heavier at 77.3 x 162 x 8 mm and 213 grams, providing a more substantial in-hand feel.

Weight

213 g

170 g

Screen size (in)

6.7

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C (USB 2)

User feedback for the iPhone 16 often highlights its integrated ecosystem, consistent performance, and the reliability of its camera system, particularly for everyday photography and video. Some users appreciate the new Camera Control button for its quick access to camera functions. Criticisms sometimes point to the standard 60Hz refresh rate display, which some find less fluid compared to devices with higher refresh rates.

For the Galaxy S24 FE, common praise includes its vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display, the versatility of its triple-camera setup with optical zoom, and Samsung's commitment to extended software updates. Users also value the inclusion of Galaxy AI features. Some feedback suggests that while the camera performs well, colors can sometimes appear oversaturated, and the telephoto lens might be less effective at higher digital zoom levels.

Users prioritizing a compact device with a highly integrated software experience and strong video capabilities may find the iPhone 16 well-suited to their needs. Those who prefer a larger, more customizable Android experience with a high refresh rate display and a dedicated telephoto lens might lean toward the Galaxy S24 FE. Both devices offer compelling features for students, professionals, and travelers alike. Considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new, providing access to these advanced features sustainably.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons