iPad 5 (2017, A9 series) Vs iPad mini 3 (2015, A8 series)

iPad 5 (2017, A9 series)
iPad 5 (2017, A9 series)
Starting at

Refurbished price:86.39

Versus €409.00 new

See options
iPad mini 3 (2015, A8 series)
iPad mini 3 (2015, A8 series)
Starting at

Refurbished price:92.00

Versus €429.00 new

See options

Ratings

The iPad 2017, also known as the 5th generation iPad, and the iPad Mini 2015, or iPad Mini 4, represent two distinct approaches to Apple's tablet design from the mid-2010s. Released in March 2017, the iPad 2017 offers a larger display and a slightly newer processor, while the iPad Mini 2015, launched in September 2015, prioritizes portability with its compact form factor. Both devices operate on Apple's iPadOS, though their respective hardware generations dictate their maximum supported software versions, influencing their long-term usability.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these tablets, their release dates and subsequent software support are key factors. The iPad 2017 was introduced two years after the iPad Mini 2015, granting it a slight advantage in terms of hardware age and software longevity.

  • Release Timeline: The iPad 2017 (5th generation) was released in March 2017, making it a newer device compared to the iPad Mini 2015 (4th generation), which debuted in September 2015. This two-year difference impacts how long each device can realistically perform current tasks.
  • OS Support Duration: The iPad 2017 received updates up to iPadOS 16.7.15, while the iPad Mini 2015's software support concluded with iPadOS 15.8.7. This means the larger iPad benefits from an additional major operating system update, potentially extending its compatibility with newer applications and security patches.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Both models are now considered older generations and no longer receive the very latest iPadOS versions. However, the iPad 2017's slightly newer hardware and extended software support mean it may offer a marginally longer period of comfortable use for general tasks before performance limitations become more noticeable.

Year of Release

2017

2015

Compatible with latest Update

No

No

OS

iPadOS

iPadOS

Maximum Operating System supported

iPadOS 16

iPadOS 15

Performance

The core performance of these tablets is largely determined by their internal processing units and memory, which directly influence responsiveness and multitasking capabilities.

  • Processor Capabilities: The iPad 2017 features an A9 processor, a generation newer than the A8 processor found in the iPad Mini 2015. This difference translates to improved processing power, allowing the iPad 2017 to handle demanding applications and complex tasks with greater efficiency.
  • System Responsiveness: Users will likely experience a snappier and more fluid interface on the iPad 2017, especially when navigating between apps or running more intensive software. While both devices have 2GB of RAM, the A9 chip's enhanced efficiency contributes to a smoother overall user experience on the newer model.
  • Battery Behavior: The iPad 2017 is equipped with a larger battery capacity of 32.4 Wh, compared to the iPad Mini 2015's 19.1 Wh. Despite the larger screen to power, the iPad 2017 generally offers comparable battery life, with both models rated for up to 10 hours of web browsing or video playback on Wi-Fi.

Memory (GB)

2 GB

2 GB

Processor

Apple A9

Apple A8

Screen quality

The visual experience on these tablets is shaped by their display technology, resolution, and physical dimensions, catering to different viewing preferences.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: Both the iPad 2017 and iPad Mini 2015 feature Retina IPS LCD displays with a resolution of 2048 x 1536 pixels. This ensures sharp text and clear images on both devices.
  • Screen Size and Clarity: The iPad 2017 offers a larger 9.7-inch screen, providing a more expansive canvas for media consumption and productivity. The iPad Mini 2015, with its 7.9-inch display, has a higher pixel density (326 ppi vs 264 ppi), resulting in a slightly crisper image, though the difference may not be immediately apparent to all users.
  • Brightness and Lamination: The iPad 2017 boasts a brighter screen compared to its predecessor, which can be beneficial for outdoor use. However, the iPad Mini 2015 features a fully laminated display with an anti-reflective coating, which reduces glare and makes the screen appear closer to the glass, enhancing the viewing experience. The iPad 2017 lacks this lamination and coating.

Resolution

2048 x 1536

2048 x 1536

True Tone

No

No

Pro-Motion

No

No

Screen type

Retina display

Retina display

Pixel density

264ppp

326ppp

Brightness

500 nits brightness

400 nits brightness

Sound quality

Speakers

Stereo speakers

Stereo speakers

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both tablets are designed for casual photography and video calls, sharing similar specifications across the board.

  • Camera System Capabilities: Both the iPad 2017 and iPad Mini 2015 are equipped with an 8-megapixel rear camera with an f/2.4 aperture and a 1.2-megapixel front-facing camera with an f/2.2 aperture. These specifications allow for basic photography and video capture.
  • Photography and Video Performance: In everyday lighting conditions, both tablets deliver comparable image quality suitable for sharing on social media or for casual documentation. They can record 1080p HD video with the rear camera and 720p HD video with the front camera, making them adequate for video calls and basic video recording.
  • Audio Output: Both devices feature built-in stereo speakers, providing a similar audio experience for media consumption.

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core specifications, several practical elements differentiate these two tablets, particularly concerning their physical design and connectivity options.

  • Weight and Dimensions: A significant distinction lies in their form factor. The iPad Mini 2015 is considerably more compact and lighter, weighing approximately 299 grams for the Wi-Fi model and measuring 6.1 mm thin. In contrast, the iPad 2017 weighs around 469 grams and is 7.5 mm thick, making the Mini a more portable option for one-handed use or travel.
  • Connectivity Options: Both tablets support Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac with dual-band capabilities and Bluetooth 4.2. Optional cellular models are available for both, offering LTE connectivity for internet access on the go.
  • Ports and Sensors: Each device includes a Lightning port for charging and data transfer, along with a 3.5mm headphone jack. Both also feature Touch ID for secure authentication.

Weight

469 g

299 g

Width

16.95 cm

13.42 cm

Height

24 cm

20.32 cm

Depth

0.75 cm

0.61 cm

Screen size (in)

9.7

7.9

Network

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi

Carrier compatibility

Without SIM Port

Without SIM Port

Wi-Fi technology

Wi-Fi 6 802.11a/b/g/n/ac

Wi-Fi 6 802.11a/b/g/n/ac

Bluetooth Version

Bluetooth 4.2

Bluetooth 4.2

Face ID

No

No

Touch ID

Yes

Yes

Connector

Lightning connector

Lightning connector

User feedback for the iPad 2017 often highlights its role as a solid, entry-level tablet, praised for its larger screen suitable for general media consumption and light productivity. Some users noted its design was not a significant departure from older models. The iPad Mini 2015, on the other hand, is frequently lauded for its exceptional portability and comfortable one-handed use, making it a favorite for reading and on-the-go entertainment. Criticisms sometimes pointed to its aging processor compared to contemporary full-sized iPads at its release.

For users prioritizing a larger display for immersive viewing experiences, educational applications, or light work, the iPad 2017 may be the more suitable choice. Its slightly newer processor and extended software support offer a marginal advantage in longevity and performance for these tasks. Conversely, individuals who value extreme portability, ease of handling, and a compact device for reading or casual gaming will likely find the iPad Mini 2015 better aligns with their needs. Its smaller size and lighter weight make it ideal for travel or situations where a larger tablet might be cumbersome.

Ultimately, the decision between these two tablets depends on individual priorities regarding screen size versus portability and the expected duration of software support. Both models, as quality-assured refurbished options, offer an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking reliable technology with a reduced environmental impact.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons