Galaxy S23 Ultra Vs iPhone 16e

Galaxy S23 Ultra
Galaxy S23 Ultra
Starting at

Refurbished price:430.00

Versus €1,409.00 new

See options
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e
Starting at

Refurbished price:387.00

Versus €719.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, released in February 2023, and the hypothetical iPhone 16E, expected in 2026, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While the S23 Ultra offers a comprehensive, feature-rich Android experience with a focus on advanced camera capabilities and a large display, the iPhone 16E is anticipated to deliver a streamlined iOS experience, potentially in a more compact form factor, with a strong emphasis on core performance and Apple's ecosystem. These devices cater to different user preferences, particularly concerning operating system choice and device size.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is significantly influenced by its release timeline and the manufacturer's commitment to software updates.

  • Software Support: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, launched in early 2023, is guaranteed to receive four generations of Android OS updates, extending its major software support until approximately 2027, and five years of security patches, likely until 2028. The iPhone 16E, being a 2026 release, is expected to benefit from Apple's typically longer software support, which historically ranges from five to seven years for major iOS updates and even longer for security patches. This suggests the iPhone 16E could receive updates well into the early 2030s.
  • Durability and Repairability: Both devices are expected to feature robust build materials and water resistance ratings. The S23 Ultra includes Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for screen protection and an IP68 rating. The iPhone 16E is anticipated to incorporate Apple's Ceramic Shield on the front, along with enhanced water and dust resistance. While specific repairability scores vary, both manufacturers generally offer repair services for several years post-release.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users can expect the Galaxy S23 Ultra to remain a capable device for at least five years, with its performance and security maintained through regular updates. The iPhone 16E, due to its later release and Apple's extended software commitment, is likely to offer a slightly longer practical lifespan in terms of receiving the latest software features and security enhancements.

Year of Release

2023

2025

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance is a key differentiator, impacting how smoothly applications run and how efficiently the device handles demanding tasks.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is powered by a custom-tuned processor designed for high-end Android performance, ensuring smooth operation for demanding applications, multitasking, and graphics-intensive gaming. The iPhone 16E is expected to feature a recent-generation A-series chip, providing excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming within the iOS ecosystem. However, rumors suggest the 16E might have a slightly less powerful graphics processing unit compared to the main iPhone 16 models, which could result in minor differences in graphics-heavy applications.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices offer ample storage options to accommodate various user needs. The S23 Ultra typically comes with generous RAM configurations, contributing to seamless app switching and background process management. The iPhone 16E is also expected to include sufficient RAM to ensure fluid multitasking, a hallmark of the iOS experience.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy S23 Ultra is known for its exceptional battery endurance, often lasting more than a full day of heavy use, with some users reporting up to two days on a single charge. The iPhone 16E is also anticipated to offer good battery life, with expectations of extended video playback times, suggesting it will comfortably last through a typical day for most users.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is the primary interface for user interaction, and both devices offer high-quality visual experiences with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features a large 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a sharp QHD+ resolution (3088x1440 pixels), providing exceptional clarity and vibrant colors. The iPhone 16E is expected to come with a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, offering deep blacks and accurate color reproduction at a resolution of 2532x1170 pixels.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The S23 Ultra boasts an adaptive refresh rate ranging from 1Hz to 120Hz, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsive visuals, along with a high peak brightness of up to 1750 nits for excellent outdoor visibility. The iPhone 16E is anticipated to have a standard 60Hz refresh rate and a maximum brightness of 800 nits, with a peak HDR brightness of 1200 nits.
  • Viewing Experience: The larger screen of the S23 Ultra provides an expansive canvas for media consumption and productivity, complemented by its high resolution and adaptive refresh rate. The iPhone 16E's display, while smaller, still offers a high-quality OLED viewing experience, though without the smoother motion of a higher refresh rate. The S23 Ultra features a punch-hole camera, while the iPhone 16E is expected to retain a notch.

Resolution

1440 x 3088

2532x1170

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer advanced camera systems, though they differ in their approach to versatility and computational photography.

  • Camera System Configuration: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features a versatile quad-camera setup, including a 200MP main sensor, a 12MP ultrawide lens, and two 10MP telephoto lenses offering 3x and 10x optical zoom. This allows for significant zoom capabilities and detailed captures. The iPhone 16E is expected to feature a single 48MP main camera, utilizing sensor cropping for a 2x zoom effect.
  • Photography Performance: The S23 Ultra excels in capturing highly detailed images, especially with its 200MP sensor, and offers strong low-light performance. Its multiple lenses provide flexibility for various shooting scenarios, including distant subjects. The iPhone 16E's single main camera is anticipated to deliver excellent image quality with Apple's computational photography, particularly for everyday shots and portraits. However, it is not expected to include features like macro photography or spatial photos.
  • Video Capabilities: The Galaxy S23 Ultra supports 8K video recording, offering high-resolution video capture. The iPhone 16E is expected to maintain Apple's reputation for high-quality video recording, likely supporting 4K at 60 frames per second with Dolby Vision HDR, but without advanced modes like Cinematic or Action Mode. Both devices include capable front-facing cameras for selfies and video calls.

Front camera

12 megapixels

TrueDepth 12MP

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily usability of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy S23 Ultra and the iPhone 16E are expected to support modern connectivity standards, including 5G and advanced Wi-Fi protocols like Wi-Fi 6E or potentially Wi-Fi 7 for the newer iPhone. The S23 Ultra features a USB-C port. The iPhone 16E is also expected to adopt a USB-C port, aligning with recent Apple trends.
  • Biometric Security and Navigation: The S23 Ultra typically uses an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The iPhone 16E is expected to rely on Face ID for biometric authentication. The S23 Ultra integrates the S Pen, offering unique productivity and creative functionalities. The iPhone 16E is rumored to include an Action Button, providing a customizable shortcut for various functions.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy S23 Ultra is a large and relatively heavy device, which some users appreciate for its expansive screen, while others find it less comfortable for one-handed use. The iPhone 16E is likely to offer a more compact and potentially lighter design, making it easier to handle for users who prefer smaller phones. The S23 Ultra offers a wider range of color options, while the iPhone 16E might be limited to fewer choices.

Weight

233 g

167 g

Screen size (in)

6.8

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the iPhone 16E cater to users with differing priorities and ecosystem preferences. Users frequently praise the S23 Ultra for its exceptional battery life, often noting it lasts well over a day even with heavy usage. Its camera system, particularly the versatile zoom capabilities and high-resolution main sensor, receives consistent acclaim for capturing detailed and flexible shots. Some users, however, find its large size and weight to be a consideration for one-handed operation.

For the iPhone 16E, user expectations center around a reliable and fluid iOS experience, with strong performance for everyday tasks. The anticipated longer software support from Apple is a significant draw for users prioritizing long-term device viability. Potential criticisms might arise from the expected 60Hz display refresh rate and the absence of some advanced camera features found in higher-tier iPhones or the S23 Ultra. The presence of a notch instead of the Dynamic Island might also be a point of discussion for some users.

Users prioritizing an expansive display, advanced multi-lens camera system with extensive zoom, and a highly customizable Android experience may find the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra well-suited to their needs. Conversely, users who value a streamlined operating system, potentially longer software update longevity, and a more compact form factor within the Apple ecosystem might lean towards the iPhone 16E. Both devices offer robust performance and features, making the choice dependent on individual preferences for operating system, camera versatility, and device size. For those considering either device, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons