Galaxy A35 Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:206.00

Versus €431.43 new

See options
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Starting at

Refurbished price:198.00

Versus €449.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ are both Android smartphones released in 2024, offering a range of features for everyday users. The Galaxy A35, launched in March 2024, emphasizes long-term software support and a robust build, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+, introduced in January 2024, focuses on rapid charging capabilities and a high-resolution main camera. Both devices run on the Android operating system, providing access to a wide ecosystem of applications and services.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release timelines, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A35 was released in March 2024, making it slightly newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+, which launched in January 2024. This difference in release date can influence the duration of future software support.
  • Software Support: Samsung has committed to providing the Galaxy A35 with four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates, extending its software lifespan significantly, potentially up to Android 18 and security patches until 2029. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to receive three major OS updates, reaching up to Android 16, and four years of security updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A35 features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, and its display is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a higher IP68 rating, indicating enhanced protection against dust and water, and also uses Gorilla Glass Victus for screen protection. The Galaxy A35 has a plastic back and frame, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ typically features a glass front and back, sometimes with a vegan leather option.

Year of Release

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from browsing to gaming. Both devices offer capable hardware, but with different strengths.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A35 provides smooth performance for most everyday applications, though some users have noted occasional minor slowdowns when launching heavier apps or during extended gaming sessions. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ generally offers a more responsive experience, handling demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, with good thermal management during intensive use.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A35 typically comes with 8GB of RAM and offers 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, which can be expanded using a microSD card up to 1TB. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is available with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and comes with larger internal storage options of 256GB or 512GB, but it does not support microSD card expansion.
  • Battery and Charging: Both smartphones are equipped with a 5000mAh battery, providing sufficient power for a full day of moderate to heavy use. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The Galaxy A35 supports 25W fast charging, which takes approximately 1.5 hours for a full charge. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features 120W HyperCharge technology, capable of fully charging the device in under 25 minutes.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a key aspect of modern smartphones, and both the Galaxy A35 and Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offer vibrant displays.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ comes with a slightly larger 6.67-inch AMOLED display, which is curved at the edges, offering an immersive viewing experience.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Galaxy A35 provides a Full HD+ resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a higher 1.5K resolution of 2712x1220 pixels, resulting in slightly sharper visuals.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. The Galaxy A35 offers a typical brightness of 1000 nits, ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ can reach a peak brightness of 1800 nits, which can be beneficial for outdoor use under direct sunlight.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1220 x 2712

Screen type

Super AMOLED

AMOLED

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a primary consideration. Both smartphones offer versatile camera setups, though with different main sensor resolutions.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A35 is equipped with a triple-camera setup, featuring a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also has a triple-camera system, highlighted by a 200-megapixel main sensor with OIS, an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 2-megapixel macro lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35's main camera performs well in daylight, producing sharp and vibrant photos, but its low-light performance can be less consistent. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s high-resolution main camera is capable of capturing detailed images, even in low-light conditions, though its ultrawide and macro lenses are considered more basic.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: Both phones can record video at 4K resolution at 30 frames per second with their main rear cameras. The Galaxy A35's 13-megapixel front camera can also record 4K video at 30fps. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features a 16-megapixel front camera, which records at 1080p at 60fps.

Main camera

50 megapixels

200 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

16 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A35 and Redmi Note 13 Pro+ support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.3, ensuring modern wireless communication standards. They both utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer.
  • Biometrics and Sensors: For security, both devices incorporate an in-display optical fingerprint sensor. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also includes an infrared (IR) blaster, which allows it to function as a universal remote control for compatible electronics.
  • Design and Expandability: The Galaxy A35 has a weight of 209 grams and dimensions of 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm. It offers expandable storage via a microSD card slot. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ weighs 204.5 grams and measures 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm. It does not feature expandable storage.

Weight

209 g

204 g

Width

78 cm

7,42 cm

Height

161,7 cm

16,14 cm

Depth

8,2 cm

0,89 cm

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.67

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A35 often highlights its excellent display, reliable performance for daily use, and strong battery life, with many appreciating Samsung's commitment to extended software updates. Criticisms sometimes point to its low-light camera performance and the relatively slower charging speed compared to some competitors. For the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+, users frequently praise its vibrant, high-resolution display, exceptionally fast charging, and capable main camera. Common concerns include its battery life, which some find uninspiring despite the large capacity, and the presence of pre-installed applications.

Users prioritizing long-term software support, consistent daylight photography, and the flexibility of expandable storage may find the Samsung Galaxy A35 to be a suitable choice. Conversely, individuals who value rapid charging, a high-resolution main camera, and a vibrant, curved display might lean towards the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+. Both devices offer compelling features, and for those seeking a sustainable choice, considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons