Galaxy A35 Vs iPhone 13

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:206.00

Versus €431.43 new

See options
iPhone 13
iPhone 13
Starting at

Refurbished price:240.00

Versus €769.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the iPhone 13 are two distinct smartphones, released in March 2024 and September 2021, respectively. While the Galaxy A35 operates on Android with Samsung's One UI, the iPhone 13 runs on Apple's iOS platform. These devices cater to different user preferences, primarily differing in their operating system ecosystems, design philosophies, and core hardware capabilities.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release and Software Support: The Samsung Galaxy A35, launched in March 2024, is expected to receive four generations of Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates, with security patches typically delivered quarterly. The iPhone 13, released in September 2021, generally receives major iOS updates for approximately five to seven years from its launch, with security updates extending beyond that period. [14, 19, 30, 34, 35, 36, 39, 40]
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A35 has a repairability score of 8.4 out of 10 in some regions, indicating a design that facilitates easier repairs and better availability of spare parts compared to its predecessors. [1, 3, 5] The iPhone 13 initially received an iFixit repairability score of 5 out of 10, which later improved to 6 out of 10 with a software update addressing a Face ID issue related to screen replacements. [4, 6, 7, 16, 23] While many components in the iPhone 13 are modular, the integration between hardware and software can complicate independent repairs. [4, 16]
  • Practical Lifespan: Both devices are built to offer a practical lifespan of several years. The Galaxy A35 benefits from a more recent release, potentially offering a slightly longer period of active software support from its launch date. The iPhone 13, despite being an older model, is known for Apple's extended software support, allowing it to remain functional and secure for a considerable duration. [14, 19, 30, 39, 40]

Year of Release

2024

2021

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, app usage, and multitasking, and these two devices offer different experiences.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A35 handles everyday tasks smoothly, with users reporting a generally fast and responsive experience for common applications. However, some users have noted occasional lag when launching more demanding apps or during intensive use. [15, 26] The iPhone 13 provides a consistently fluid experience across various applications, including graphically intensive games, due to its optimized hardware and software integration. [20, 21]
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy A35 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and offers storage options of 128GB or 256GB, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card. [2, 10, 18] The iPhone 13 comes with 4GB of RAM and storage options up to 512GB, but it does not support expandable storage. [9, 12, 20] Users of the iPhone 13 have sometimes observed that its RAM capacity can limit the number of applications it can keep active in memory simultaneously. [20, 21]
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A35 features a 5000mAh battery, which typically provides a full day of use for most users, with some reporting up to 7 hours of screen-on time under normal conditions. [2, 15, 18, 26] The iPhone 13, with its 3227 mAh battery, also generally offers good battery life, often lasting through a full day for average users. [12, 20, 21, 27] Both devices support fast charging, though the Galaxy A35's 25W charging is noted by some users as being slower than desired. [2, 26]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both models offer distinct visual experiences.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. [2, 10, 15, 18] The iPhone 13 has a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2532x1170 pixels, also known for its excellent color accuracy and contrast. [12, 25]
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: A notable difference lies in the refresh rate; the Galaxy A35 offers a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience. [2, 15] The iPhone 13, on the other hand, has a standard 60Hz refresh rate. [20, 25] While iOS optimization helps mitigate the perception of a lower refresh rate, users accustomed to higher refresh rates may notice the difference. [25]
  • Brightness and Viewing Experience: Both displays offer good clarity for typical viewing. However, some Galaxy A35 users have reported that outdoor brightness can be a limitation, with colors appearing somewhat washed out in direct sunlight. [15] The iPhone 13's OLED display generally maintains good visibility in various lighting conditions. The iPhone 13 also features a notch at the top of the display, which houses the front camera and sensors. [25]

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1170 x 2532

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina XDR OLED

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a significant factor in choosing a smartphone, and these devices approach photography differently.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is equipped with a triple rear camera setup, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. [2, 10, 18, 31] The iPhone 13 features a dual-camera system on the rear, comprising a main wide-angle lens and an ultrawide lens, both 12-megapixel. [12]
  • Photography Performance: In daylight, the Galaxy A35 captures images with good detail and saturated colors. [15, 31] However, its low-light performance can result in blurry and noisy photos. [15] The iPhone 13 is praised for its ability to take high-quality photos in various conditions, including good night mode performance. [20, 21, 25] The macro lens on the Galaxy A35 is often considered a niche feature, with some users finding it less practical for everyday use. [15]
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices are capable of recording video in 4K resolution at 30 frames per second. [10] The Galaxy A35 includes stereo speakers that offer loud output, though some users suggest the bass levels could be improved. [31] The iPhone 13 also provides a good audio experience for media consumption and calls.

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features and design elements contribute to the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A35 and iPhone 13 support 5G connectivity for faster mobile data speeds. The Galaxy A35 uses a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer, a widely adopted standard. [2] The iPhone 13 utilizes Apple's proprietary Lightning port. [19] The Galaxy A35 also supports Wi-Fi and GPS, while the iPhone 13 includes Wi-Fi 6e support with a software update. [2, 19]
  • Biometric Security: For secure unlocking and authentication, the Galaxy A35 features an in-display fingerprint sensor. [2] The iPhone 13 relies on Face ID, Apple's facial recognition system.
  • Build and Durability Features: The Galaxy A35 has an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering protection against immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. [2] It also features a metal body. [2] The iPhone 13 carries an IP68 rating, allowing for immersion up to 6 meters for 30 minutes, and incorporates Ceramic Shield on the front for enhanced drop protection. Both devices are designed to withstand daily wear and tear.
  • Dimensions and Handling: The Galaxy A35 is a larger and heavier device, weighing 209 grams. [2, 22] The iPhone 13 is more compact and lighter at 174 grams. These differences can impact one-handed use and pocketability, with the iPhone 13 generally offering a more manageable feel for some users. [20, 22]

Weight

209 g

173 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

Lightning

User feedback for both the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the iPhone 13 highlights their respective strengths and areas for consideration. The Galaxy A35 is frequently praised for its vibrant display, long-lasting battery, and the inclusion of expandable storage, which is a significant advantage for users who need ample space for media and apps. [15, 26, 37] Some users, however, have noted that its performance can occasionally feel less fluid with demanding applications, and the outdoor visibility of its screen could be improved. [15, 22]

The iPhone 13 consistently receives positive remarks for its smooth and reliable performance, high-quality camera system, and the overall polished user experience provided by iOS. [20, 21, 25] Common criticisms include its 60Hz display, which some users find less smooth compared to higher refresh rate screens, and the relatively smaller RAM capacity that can affect multitasking with many apps open. [20, 25]

Users prioritizing a large, high-refresh-rate display, extensive battery life, and the flexibility of expandable storage may find the Samsung Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. It offers a modern Android experience with a strong commitment to software updates. Conversely, users who value consistent, fluid performance, a highly capable camera for various lighting conditions, and a compact design within the Apple ecosystem may lean toward the iPhone 13. Both devices represent solid choices in their respective categories, and opting for a quality-assured refurbished option can be a sustainable choice for either model.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons