Galaxy A35 Vs Google Pixel Fold

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:206.00

Versus €431.43 new

See options
Google Pixel Fold
Google Pixel Fold
Starting at

Refurbished price:454.00

Versus €1,750.29 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Google Pixel Fold represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy A35, released in March 2024, is a traditional smartphone offering a balanced experience for everyday use. In contrast, the Google Pixel Fold, launched in June 2023, is a foldable device that transforms from a compact phone into a larger tablet-like screen. Both devices run on the Android operating system, but their form factors and intended user experiences differ significantly, impacting aspects like durability, performance, and display.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A35 was released in March 2024, making it a more recent device compared to the Google Pixel Fold, which launched in June 2023. This difference in release date means the Galaxy A35 benefits from a slightly newer starting point for software support.
  • Software Support: The Galaxy A35 is expected to receive four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates, extending its support until Android 18 and security patches until 2029. The Google Pixel Fold, on the other hand, is guaranteed five years of both OS and security updates, with support extending until at least June 2028.
  • Durability Considerations: The Galaxy A35 features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, along with Gorilla Glass Victus Plus on both its front and back, contributing to its overall resilience. The Pixel Fold has an IPX8 water resistance rating, meaning it can withstand water immersion but lacks an official dust resistance rating. Its foldable design, while innovative, introduces unique durability aspects, with some early user reports noting concerns about the inner screen's fragility and the hinge's long-term resilience to debris.

Year of Release

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance of these devices is influenced by their internal components, affecting how smoothly they handle daily tasks and demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel Fold is equipped with a current-generation processor, which enables it to handle demanding applications and multitasking smoothly. The Samsung Galaxy A35 features an octa-core processor that is capable of managing multitasking, gaming, and streaming effectively.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The Pixel Fold offers 12GB of RAM, contributing to its ability to switch between applications quickly and maintain responsiveness even with multiple apps open. The Galaxy A35 comes with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, which provides a solid foundation for general smartphone usage and multitasking.
  • Storage and Expansion: Both devices offer internal storage options, with the Pixel Fold available in 256GB or 512GB configurations. The Galaxy A35 offers 128GB or 256GB of internal storage and includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage up to 1TB, providing flexibility for users who need more space for media and files.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator, with the Pixel Fold offering a unique dual-screen setup compared to the Galaxy A35's single, traditional display.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. The Google Pixel Fold boasts two OLED displays: a 5.8-inch outer screen with a 2092x1080 pixel resolution and a larger 7.6-inch foldable inner screen with a 2208x1840 pixel resolution.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both devices offer a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling and more fluid visuals. The Pixel Fold's outer screen can reach a peak brightness of 1550 nits, while its inner screen peaks at 1450 nits, making it suitable for outdoor visibility. The Galaxy A35 also provides a vivid viewing experience, with good clarity whether indoors or in bright conditions.
  • Screen Size and Aspect Ratio: The Galaxy A35 offers a conventional smartphone screen size, providing a familiar viewing experience. The Pixel Fold's outer screen has a wider aspect ratio, which can make one-handed typing and general use more comfortable than some other foldable designs. When unfolded, its 7.6-inch inner screen offers a larger canvas for multitasking and media consumption, though some content may display with black bars due to its squarer aspect ratio.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1840 x 2208

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Foldable OLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, but they cater to different photographic needs and experiences.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Google Pixel Fold features a versatile triple rear camera setup, including a 48MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 10.8MP ultrawide camera, and a 10.8MP telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom. The Samsung Galaxy A35 also has a triple rear camera system, comprising a 50MP main camera with OIS, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro camera.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel Fold is praised for its balanced and realistic photo output, with strong performance across its main, ultrawide, and telephoto lenses, and good low-light capabilities. The Galaxy A35's main camera performs well in various conditions, capturing detailed and vibrant images, though colors can sometimes appear oversaturated. It lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, relying on digital zoom for distant subjects.
  • Video Recording and Front Cameras: The Pixel Fold supports video recording up to 4K at 60 frames per second (fps) and includes multiple front-facing cameras: a 9.5MP on the cover screen and an 8MP above the inner display. The Galaxy A35 can record videos at up to 4K at 30fps and features a 13MP front camera for selfies.

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A35 and Pixel Fold support 5G connectivity and modern Wi-Fi standards. They both utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer. The Pixel Fold also includes an Ultra-wideband (UWB) chip.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A35 features an optical fingerprint sensor integrated into the display for secure unlocking. The Pixel Fold uses a side-mounted fingerprint reader, which some users find to be very fast and responsive.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A35 has a traditional slate form factor, measuring 161.70 x 78.00 x 8.20mm and weighing 209 grams, making it a comfortable size for one-handed use. The Pixel Fold, when folded, measures 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1mm and weighs 283 grams, giving it a more substantial feel. Its wider outer screen is designed to be more usable as a regular phone.

Weight

209 g

283 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

7.6

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and Google Pixel Fold cater to different user preferences, each excelling in distinct areas. The Galaxy A35 is often praised for its robust battery life, capable main camera, and durable build with an IP67 rating, making it a reliable choice for everyday smartphone users. Users appreciate its vibrant Super AMOLED display and consistent performance for general tasks. Some common feedback notes that while its camera is good for its class, it lacks a telephoto lens, and colors can sometimes be oversaturated.

The Google Pixel Fold receives commendation for its innovative foldable design, offering the versatility of a smartphone and a small tablet in one device. Its camera system, particularly the inclusion of a telephoto lens and Google's image processing, is frequently highlighted as a strong point, producing balanced and realistic photos. The wider aspect ratio of its outer screen is also often cited as a positive for usability. However, some users have expressed concerns regarding its initial durability, particularly the inner screen, and its weight.

Users prioritizing a traditional, durable smartphone experience with excellent battery life and consistent performance for daily tasks may find the Samsung Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a versatile, large-screen experience for multitasking and media consumption, coupled with an advanced camera system, might lean towards the Google Pixel Fold. Both devices offer a quality-assured refurbished option, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers looking to make informed and sustainable choices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons