Galaxy A34 Vs Google Pixel 7A

Galaxy A34
Galaxy A34
Starting at

Refurbished price:135.00

Versus €399.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 7A
Google Pixel 7A
Starting at

Refurbished price:177.00

Versus €649.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A34 (released March 2023) and the Google Pixel 7a (released May 2023) are both Android smartphones designed to offer a balanced user experience. While both devices run on the Android operating system, they differentiate themselves through their display technologies, camera philosophies, and software experiences. The Galaxy A34 emphasizes a larger display and expandable storage, whereas the Pixel 7a focuses on advanced computational photography and a streamlined software interface.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors. Both phones were released in 2023, offering a similar starting point for their lifecycle.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A34 is expected to receive four years of Android operating system updates and five years of security patches. In contrast, the Google Pixel 7a is designed to receive up to five major Android upgrades and security patches until 2028, potentially offering a slightly longer period of up-to-date software.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A34 features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 on its front display, while the Pixel 7a uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3. Both devices carry an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating protection against immersion in up to one meter of fresh water for 30 minutes.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing the latest software features and security updates for the longest possible duration may find the Pixel 7a's extended support beneficial. The Galaxy A34, with its Gorilla Glass 5, offers enhanced screen protection.

Year of Release

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both the Galaxy A34 and Pixel 7a are equipped with capable processors designed for smooth daily operation, though they approach performance with different underlying architectures.

  • Everyday Responsiveness: The Pixel 7a, powered by a current-generation Google-designed processor, handles demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, providing a fluid user experience. The Galaxy A34, with its octa-core processor, also delivers responsive performance for typical daily tasks and moderate gaming.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A34 features a larger 5000 mAh battery, which often translates to extended usage times for many users. The Pixel 7a has a 4385 mAh battery and is noted for decent battery life, with software optimizations contributing to its endurance, though heavy users might find themselves charging more frequently.
  • Storage and Multitasking: The Pixel 7a comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, which is generally sufficient for most users. The Galaxy A34 offers configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of storage, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card up to 1TB.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both smartphones is a key differentiator, with each offering distinct display technologies and characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A34 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pixel 7a comes with a 6.1-inch OLED display, also known for its rich contrast and color accuracy. Both offer Full HD+ resolutions, ensuring sharp visuals for content consumption.
  • Smoothness and Brightness: The Galaxy A34 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to very smooth scrolling and animations. The Pixel 7a offers a 90Hz refresh rate, which also provides a noticeably smoother experience than standard 60Hz displays. The Galaxy A34's display can reach up to 1000 nits in high brightness mode, offering clear visibility even in bright outdoor conditions.
  • Viewing Experience: The larger 6.6-inch screen of the Galaxy A34 provides more screen real estate for media viewing and multitasking. The Pixel 7a's slightly smaller 6.1-inch display offers a more compact form factor, which some users may find easier for one-handed use.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

OLED

Audiovisual

Both devices offer capable camera systems, but they approach photography with different hardware and software strengths.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy A34 features a triple rear camera setup with a 48MP main sensor (with OIS), an 8MP ultrawide, and a 5MP macro lens. The Pixel 7a has a dual-camera system, including a 64MP main sensor (with OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide lens. The Pixel 7a's main camera captures 16MP pixel-binned images, offering high detail.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 7a is recognized for its advanced computational photography features, including Photo Unblur, Magic Eraser, and Night Sight, which contribute to excellent photo quality and color reproduction across various lighting conditions. The Galaxy A34's main camera also performs well in good lighting, with OIS aiding in sharper images, though some reviews note its colors can appear less vibrant compared to competitors.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: Both phones are capable of recording 4K video at 30fps, with the Pixel 7a's main camera also supporting 4K at 60fps. The front-facing cameras are 13MP on both devices, with the Pixel 7a's front camera also supporting 4K video recording at 30fps.

Main camera

48 megapixels

64 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Pixel 7a supports Wi-Fi 6E, offering faster and more stable wireless connections, while the Galaxy A34 supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac). Both devices feature Bluetooth 5.3 and USB-C ports for charging and data transfer, though the Pixel 7a uses the faster USB-C 3.2 standard compared to the Galaxy A34's USB-C 2.0. Neither phone includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 7a offers both an under-display fingerprint sensor and 2D face unlock for secure access. The Galaxy A34 also includes an under-display fingerprint sensor.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A34 has a larger form factor, measuring 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2mm and weighing 199g. The Pixel 7a is more compact at 152 x 72.9 x 9mm and weighs 193.5g, potentially making it more comfortable for users who prefer smaller devices. The Galaxy A34 features a plastic back and sides with a Gorilla Glass 5 front, while the Pixel 7a has a plastic back, aluminum frame, and Gorilla Glass 3 front.

Weight

199 g

193 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A34 often praises its vibrant 120Hz Super AMOLED display, robust battery life, and the inclusion of expandable storage. Common criticisms sometimes point to its camera performance being less consistent in challenging conditions compared to some rivals, and its charging speeds.

The Google Pixel 7a is frequently lauded for its exceptional camera capabilities, often rivaling more expensive devices due to its advanced computational photography. Users also appreciate its smooth performance and the clean, bloatware-free Android experience with timely updates. Some common concerns include its battery life, which, while decent, may not always last a full day for heavy users, and its slightly slower charging speeds.

Users prioritizing a larger, smoother display for media consumption and the flexibility of expandable storage may find the Samsung Galaxy A34 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who place a high value on photography, a compact design, and a pure Android software experience with extended update support will likely lean towards the Google Pixel 7a. Both devices offer compelling features, and choosing between them depends on individual priorities. For those seeking a sustainable choice, considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons