Galaxy A56 Vs Galaxy S25

Galaxy A56
Galaxy A56
Starting at

Refurbished price:259.00

Versus €502.00 new

See options
Galaxy S25
Galaxy S25
Starting at

Refurbished price:489.00

Versus €799.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A56 and the Samsung Galaxy S25, both released in 2025, represent distinct segments within Samsung's smartphone lineup. The Galaxy A56 is positioned as a feature-rich mid-range device, while the Galaxy S25 stands as a flagship offering with advanced capabilities. While they share the Android operating system with Samsung's One UI, key differentiators emerge in their processing power, camera systems, and overall build quality, catering to different user priorities. For those considering a quality-assured refurbished option, understanding these distinctions is key to making an informed choice.

Scores

Durability

When evaluating the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are significant factors.

  • Release and Software Support: The Galaxy A56 was announced in March 2025, while the Galaxy S25 debuted earlier in February 2025. Both launched with Android 15 and One UI 7.0. The Galaxy A56 is set to receive six major Android OS upgrades and six years of security updates, with security updates later extended to seven years. The Galaxy S25, as a flagship, offers an even longer commitment with seven years of both OS upgrades and security updates, ensuring extended software longevity.
  • Build and Practical Lifespan: The Galaxy A56 features an aluminum frame and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, providing a robust mid-range construction. It carries an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering protection against immersion in up to one meter of water for 30 minutes. The Galaxy S25, on the other hand, utilizes Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for both its front and back, paired with an aluminum frame, contributing to a more premium feel and enhanced scratch resistance. It boasts an IP68 rating, allowing for submersion in deeper water. These differences suggest the S25 may offer slightly greater physical resilience over time, though both are designed for durability.

Year of Release

2025

2025

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of the Galaxy A56 and Galaxy S25 reflect their respective market positions, impacting how smoothly they handle various tasks.

  • Processing Power and Responsiveness: The Galaxy A56 is powered by the Exynos 1580 chipset, which provides efficient performance for everyday applications, web browsing, and social media. Users generally find it responsive for typical daily use, though it may show limitations with graphically intensive games or very demanding multitasking. The Galaxy S25, featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, delivers significantly higher performance. This allows for seamless execution of the most demanding applications, fluid high-fidelity gaming, and effortless multitasking without noticeable slowdowns.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A56 typically comes with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, utilizing UFS 3.1 technology. It does not support expandable storage via a microSD card. The Galaxy S25 offers 12GB of RAM across all models and storage options ranging from 128GB to 512GB, employing faster UFS 4.0 storage. The increased RAM and faster storage in the S25 contribute to quicker app loading times and more efficient data handling, particularly beneficial for power users and those who frequently switch between many applications.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both devices is a key consideration, with distinct characteristics in their display technologies.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A56 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels), offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Galaxy S25, with its 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display, also provides excellent color reproduction and contrast, but with a slightly higher pixel density at a similar resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels). While both offer sharp visuals, the S25's display technology can provide a more refined viewing experience.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both phones feature a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and fluid animations. The Galaxy A56 achieves a peak brightness of 1900 nits, with a High Brightness Mode (HBM) of 1200 nits, making it suitable for outdoor use. The Galaxy S25 surpasses this with a peak brightness of 2600 nits, ensuring exceptional visibility even in direct sunlight. The S25's LTPO technology also allows for a more adaptive refresh rate, potentially optimizing power consumption.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080x2340

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A56 and Galaxy S25 are designed to capture different levels of detail and versatility, catering to varied photography needs.

  • Rear Camera Capabilities: The Galaxy A56 is equipped with a triple-camera setup, including a 50 MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 MP ultrawide lens, and a 5 MP macro lens. It performs well in good lighting conditions, producing clear and vibrant images, and its Night Mode can improve low-light shots. The Galaxy S25 also features a triple-camera system, comprising a 50 MP wide-angle main camera with OIS, a 12 MP ultrawide camera, and a 10 MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. The S25's telephoto lens offers greater versatility for zoomed-in shots compared to the A56's macro lens.
  • Front Camera and Video Recording: For selfies and video calls, the Galaxy A56 has a 12 MP front camera, capable of recording videos up to 4K at 30 frames per second. The Galaxy S25 also includes a 12 MP front-facing camera. Both devices offer 4K video recording at 30fps from their front cameras. The Galaxy S25 extends its video capabilities with support for 8K recording at 24/30fps and 4K at 60fps from its rear cameras, providing more options for high-resolution video content creation.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity, ensuring access to faster mobile networks. The Galaxy A56 includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, along with a USB Type-C 2.0 port. The Galaxy S25 offers more advanced connectivity with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4, and its USB-C port likely supports faster data transfer speeds. Neither device includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometrics, Dimensions, and Build: The Galaxy A56 uses an optical in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. It measures 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm and weighs 198 g, featuring an aluminum frame and glass front and back. The Galaxy S25 employs an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor, which is often noted for its speed and accuracy. It is more compact and lighter, with dimensions of 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm and a weight of 162 g, also featuring an aluminum frame and glass construction. The S25 also integrates advanced AI features, enhancing various aspects of the user experience.

Weight

197 g

162 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.2

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Galaxy A56 often highlights its strong battery life, vibrant display, and reliable performance for everyday tasks, making it a solid choice for general use. Some users note that while its camera is capable in good lighting, the macro lens may not be as useful as a telephoto option, and its performance for intensive gaming can be limited.

The Galaxy S25 receives praise for its powerful processor, exceptional display brightness, and comprehensive software support, making it well-suited for demanding applications and long-term use. Common observations include its dependable camera system, though some users express a desire for more significant generational camera improvements. Its compact size is also frequently appreciated.

Users prioritizing extended software support, top-tier performance for demanding applications, and a more advanced camera system with optical zoom may find the Galaxy S25 aligns better with their needs. Conversely, individuals seeking a device with excellent battery endurance, a large vibrant display, and robust performance for daily tasks, without the need for flagship-level processing power or advanced camera features, may lean towards the Galaxy A56. Both devices offer compelling features within their respective categories, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model presents an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons