Galaxy A32 5G Vs Galaxy A50

Galaxy A32 5G
Galaxy A32 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:106.00

Versus €369.00 new

See options
Galaxy A50
Galaxy A50
Starting at

Refurbished price:99.00

Versus €350.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, released in early 2021, and the Samsung Galaxy A50, launched in early 2019, are both smartphones from Samsung's popular A-series. While the Galaxy A32 5G offers newer connectivity and a larger battery, the Galaxy A50 distinguishes itself with a superior display technology. Both devices run on the Android operating system, offering access to a wide ecosystem of applications and services.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and physical resilience. These two models present different profiles in terms of their expected practical lifespan.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy A32 5G, released in January 2021, benefits from a more recent launch compared to the Galaxy A50, which debuted in March 2019. This two-year difference directly impacts their remaining software support.
  • Software Support: The Galaxy A32 5G launched with Android 11 and was eligible for approximately three major Android OS updates and four years of security updates, extending its functional life further into the future. The Galaxy A50, starting with Android 9 Pie, received updates up to Android 11, with security updates typically lasting around three years from its release.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A32 5G generally offers good repairability, with some teardowns indicating a high score due to ease of disassembly, though the battery may require isopropyl alcohol for removal. The Galaxy A50 also has a reasonable repairability score, with accessible battery and screen components, though adhesive is used for the back cover and battery.

Year of Release

2021

2019

Compatible with latest Update

No

No

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Evaluating the performance of these devices involves looking at their processing capabilities for daily tasks, multitasking efficiency, and battery endurance.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A32 5G is equipped with a newer generation processor designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, offering a responsive user experience. The Galaxy A50 features a processor that provides adequate performance for general use and social media, though it may show limitations with more intensive applications or heavy multitasking.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A32 5G includes a larger 5000 mAh battery, which typically provides extended usage, often lasting through a full day of moderate to heavy use and potentially into a second day for lighter users. The Galaxy A50, with its 4000 mAh battery, is generally capable of lasting a full day with moderate usage.
  • Storage and RAM: Both models offer various configurations, typically starting with 4GB of RAM and 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, with expandable storage options via a microSD card. The amount of RAM can influence how many applications can run simultaneously without slowdowns.

Memory

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on a smartphone is largely defined by its display technology, resolution, and overall clarity.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Galaxy A50 features a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels), providing vibrant colors, deep blacks, and sharp images. In contrast, the Galaxy A32 5G comes with a 6.5-inch TFT LCD display, offering a lower HD+ resolution (720 x 1600 pixels), which results in less sharpness and contrast compared to the A50's AMOLED panel.
  • Brightness and Clarity: The Super AMOLED screen of the Galaxy A50 generally offers better outdoor visibility and overall clarity due to its inherent contrast capabilities. The TFT LCD on the Galaxy A32 5G provides reasonable brightness and viewing angles, but may not perform as well in direct sunlight.
  • Refresh Rate: The Galaxy A50 typically features a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Galaxy A32 5G, depending on the region, may offer a 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rate, with the latter providing a smoother scrolling experience and more fluid animations.

Resolution

720 x 1600

1080 x 2340

Screen type

TFT LCD

Super AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both devices are designed to capture everyday moments, with differences in sensor capabilities and overall image processing.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A32 5G features a quad-camera setup with a 48 MP main sensor, an 8 MP ultrawide, a 5 MP macro, and a 2 MP depth sensor. The Galaxy A50 has a triple-camera system, including a 25 MP main sensor, an 8 MP ultrawide, and a 5 MP depth sensor. The A32 5G's higher megapixel main sensor can capture more detail in good lighting conditions.
  • Photography Performance: Both phones perform well in bright, well-lit environments, producing crisp and vivid photos. In low-light conditions, the Galaxy A32 5G generally shows better performance with less noise and improved color accuracy compared to the Galaxy A50, which can struggle with detail and noise in darker settings.
  • Front Camera and Video: The Galaxy A50 is equipped with a 25 MP front-facing camera, while the Galaxy A32 5G has a 13 MP front camera. For video recording, the Galaxy A32 5G supports 4K video at 30 frames per second, offering higher resolution video capture than the Galaxy A50, which typically records up to 1080p.

Main camera

48 megapixels

25 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

25 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity: A significant differentiator is 5G connectivity, which is present in the Galaxy A32 5G, enabling faster mobile data speeds where available. The Galaxy A50 supports 4G LTE networks. Both devices include Wi-Fi (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) and Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Ports and Sensors: Both smartphones feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and retain a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Galaxy A50 incorporates an in-display optical fingerprint sensor, while the Galaxy A32 5G typically has a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button.
  • Build and Handling: Both devices feature a glass front (Gorilla Glass 3 on A50, Gorilla Glass 5 on A32 5G) with a plastic back and frame. The Galaxy A50 is lighter at 166g and thinner at 7.7mm, offering a more compact feel. The Galaxy A32 5G is heavier at 205g and thicker at 9.1mm, which accommodates its larger battery.

Weight

205 g

166 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.4

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

User feedback for the Galaxy A32 5G often praises its long-lasting battery life, reliable performance for its segment, and the inclusion of 5G connectivity. Some common criticisms point to its lower-resolution TFT LCD display compared to other devices in its class. Users appreciate the extended software support, making it a viable option for those seeking a device with a longer update cycle.

The Galaxy A50 is frequently lauded for its vibrant Super AMOLED display and generally good camera performance in well-lit conditions. Its design, with a slim profile and lighter build, also received positive remarks. However, some users noted occasional performance hiccups with heavy multitasking and less impressive low-light camera capabilities. The in-display fingerprint sensor was also a point of mixed reviews, with some finding it inconsistent.

Users prioritizing a vibrant, high-resolution display and a more compact, lighter design may find the Galaxy A50 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value newer connectivity standards like 5G, a larger battery for extended usage, and longer software support will likely lean towards the Galaxy A32 5G. Both devices offer a solid Android experience, and choosing between them often comes down to these specific priorities. For those considering either model, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons