Galaxy A54 Vs Galaxy S22 5G

Galaxy A54
Galaxy A54
Starting at

Refurbished price:178.00

Versus €527.33 new

See options
Galaxy S22 5G
Galaxy S22 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:174.00

Versus €851.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, released in March 2023, and the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G, launched in February 2022, represent different segments of Samsung's smartphone offerings. While both operate on the Android platform, the Galaxy A54 is positioned as a robust mid-range device with a focus on battery longevity and extended software support, whereas the Galaxy S22 was a flagship model emphasizing raw performance and advanced camera capabilities. These distinctions cater to varying user priorities, from everyday reliability to high-demand usage.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors. The Galaxy A54 5G, being the newer device, benefits from a longer guaranteed update schedule, while the Galaxy S22, as an older flagship, still offers solid durability features.

  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy A54 5G launched with Android 13 and is guaranteed to receive four major OS updates, extending its support up to Android 17, along with five years of security patches. The Galaxy S22, released with Android 12, also received four major OS updates and five years of security updates, meaning its major OS update cycle is nearing its conclusion.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A54 features Gorilla Glass 5 on both its front and back, offering a good level of scratch and drop resistance, complemented by an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Galaxy S22 boasts Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides and an aluminum frame, providing enhanced protection, along with an IP68 rating for superior dust and water immersion resistance.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A54 is considered fairly repairable, with a score of 6.25 out of 10, indicating that components like the battery and screen are accessible, though some adhesive is used. The Galaxy S22 has a repairability score of 7.5 out of 10 from some sources, but others note that strong adhesives make battery replacement particularly challenging.

Year of Release

2023

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone significantly impacts daily interactions, from launching applications to handling demanding tasks. Both devices offer capable performance, but they are designed with different priorities in mind.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy S22, equipped with a more powerful processor designed for flagship performance, handles demanding applications, intensive multitasking, and graphic-heavy gaming with notable smoothness and responsiveness. The Galaxy A54's processor is well-suited for everyday tasks, general browsing, and moderate gaming, though some users have reported occasional slowdowns or heating during prolonged heavy use.
  • Storage and Multitasking: Both models offer configurations with ample internal storage and RAM for typical user needs. The Galaxy A54 provides the flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card, which is beneficial for users who require significant space for media and files. The Galaxy S22 does not include a microSD card slot, relying solely on its internal storage options.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A54 features a larger 5000 mAh battery, which generally translates to longer usage times, with many users experiencing a full day or more of power even with moderate to heavy use. The Galaxy S22 has a smaller 3700 mAh battery, which typically requires more frequent charging for heavy users, often lasting 5-6 hours of screen-on time.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone users, and both the Galaxy A54 and Galaxy S22 offer vibrant viewing experiences, though with distinct characteristics in technology and size.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy A54 features a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display, providing rich colors and deep blacks, suitable for media consumption. The Galaxy S22 has a slightly smaller 6.1-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, which offers enhanced color accuracy and contrast, often associated with a more premium viewing experience.
  • Brightness and Clarity: The Galaxy A54's display reaches a peak brightness of 1000 nits in High Brightness Mode (HBM), ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Galaxy S22 offers a higher peak brightness of 1300 nits, which contributes to superior outdoor visibility and a more impactful HDR viewing experience. Both displays feature a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, delivering sharp and clear visuals.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both devices boast a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and fluid animations. The Galaxy S22's display is adaptive, dynamically adjusting its refresh rate from 10Hz to 120Hz to optimize power consumption based on content. The Galaxy A54's 120Hz refresh rate is generally static, which can be excellent for consistent smoothness but may consume more power.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities are a significant consideration for many users, and both the Galaxy A54 and Galaxy S22 offer versatile camera systems, each with its own strengths in capturing photos and videos.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A54 features a triple-camera setup with a 50 MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 MP ultrawide lens, and a 5 MP macro lens. The Galaxy S22 also has a triple-camera system, including a 50 MP main sensor with OIS, a 12 MP ultrawide lens, and a 10 MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom and OIS, providing greater versatility for distant subjects.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A54's main camera performs well in various lighting conditions, including low light, and generally produces images with good color reproduction. Some users have noted that Samsung's processing can lead to oversaturated colors. The Galaxy S22's camera system, particularly with its telephoto lens, offers more options for different shooting scenarios and is praised for its low-light performance with features like auto framerate and Super Night Solution.
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices are capable of recording 4K video at 30 frames per second (fps) with their main and selfie cameras. The Galaxy S22 extends its video capabilities with 8K recording at 24fps and 4K at 60fps for both its main and selfie cameras, offering higher quality and smoother motion capture. Both phones include stereo speakers for media consumption, but neither features a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

10 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience, including connectivity, physical design, and additional functionalities.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity and modern Wi-Fi standards, ensuring fast internet access. The Galaxy A54 features Bluetooth 5.3, a slightly newer standard than the Galaxy S22's Bluetooth 5.2, potentially offering minor improvements in efficiency and range. Both devices utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer and omit the traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Sensors and Security: Both models incorporate essential sensors, including an in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Galaxy S22 also supports wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, adding convenience for users who prefer cable-free power solutions or wish to charge accessories. The Galaxy A54 does not offer wireless charging.
  • Build Materials and Handling: The Galaxy A54 features a glass front and back (Gorilla Glass 5) with a plastic frame, contributing to its overall feel and durability. It weighs 202g and has dimensions of 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm. The Galaxy S22 presents a more premium build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, coupled with an aluminum frame. It is lighter at 167g and more compact, measuring 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm, which can make it more comfortable for one-handed use.

Weight

202 g

195 g

Screen size (in)

6.4

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Galaxy A54 often highlights its impressive battery life, vibrant display, and Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates as significant advantages. Users appreciate its capable main camera for everyday photography and the inclusion of expandable storage. However, some criticisms include occasional performance slowdowns under heavy load, potential display inconsistencies like color shifts, and the absence of wireless charging.

The Galaxy S22 is frequently praised for its powerful processing capabilities, making it suitable for demanding applications and gaming. Its more versatile camera system, particularly the telephoto lens, is a strong point, as is its compact and premium design with enhanced durability features like Gorilla Glass Victus+ and IP68 water resistance. Common concerns for the S22 revolve around its comparatively smaller battery capacity, which may necessitate more frequent charging for active users.

Users prioritizing extended battery life, a larger screen for media consumption, and long-term software support may find the Galaxy A54 5G well-suited to their needs. Its expandable storage also appeals to those who manage large amounts of data. Conversely, users who prioritize raw processing power, a more versatile camera system with optical zoom, a compact form factor, and premium build materials, along with the convenience of wireless charging, may lean towards the Galaxy S22 5G. Both devices offer a quality Android experience, and choosing between them depends on which set of features aligns best with individual usage patterns. Opting for a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can also be an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons