Galaxy A34 Vs Galaxy A35

Galaxy A34
Galaxy A34
Starting at

Refurbished price:135.00

Versus €399.00 new

See options
Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:209.00

Versus €429.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A34 (2023) and Galaxy A35 (2024) are both mid-range Android smartphones from Samsung's popular A series. While they share a similar design philosophy and core functionalities, the newer Galaxy A35 brings updates to its internal components, display protection, and camera capabilities, offering a refined experience over its predecessor. Both devices run on the Android operating system with Samsung's One UI, ensuring a consistent software experience.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release timelines, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy A34 was released in March 2023, while the Galaxy A35 followed in March 2024. This one-year difference means the A35 benefits from a longer period of guaranteed software updates. [3, 9, 11, 15, 22, 27]
  • Software Longevity: Both models are committed to receiving four major Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates from their respective launch dates. This means the Galaxy A35 will receive software support for approximately one year longer than the Galaxy A34, extending its practical lifespan for users who prioritize the latest features and security patches. [3, 5, 10, 18, 21, 22, 23, 28, 38]
  • Build Durability: The Galaxy A34 features Gorilla Glass 5 protection on its display, with a plastic back and sides. [3, 19] The Galaxy A35 upgrades this to Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, offering enhanced scratch and drop resistance. [2] Both devices carry an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating they can withstand immersion in up to one meter of fresh water for 30 minutes. [10, 14, 18, 19]

Year of Release

2023

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of these smartphones is largely determined by their internal processing power and memory configurations, impacting how smoothly they handle daily tasks and more demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A34 is powered by an octa-core processor, which handles everyday tasks and even some graphics-intensive games adequately. [3, 19] The Galaxy A35 features an updated octa-core processor, which offers a modest improvement in multi-core performance compared to the A34. [1, 22, 38] This translates to slightly snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the A35. [20, 38]
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices are available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage. [3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 16, 22, 29, 31] They also support expandable storage via a microSD card, allowing users to increase storage capacity by up to 1TB. [3, 2, 4, 16, 22, 29, 31] This flexibility is beneficial for users who store a large number of photos, videos, or applications.
  • Real-world Responsiveness: For general use like browsing, social media, and email, both phones offer a responsive experience. The Galaxy A35, with its newer processor, may exhibit slightly better fluidity, though some users have reported occasional lag when launching heavier applications or navigating the user interface. [20, 32] The Galaxy A35 also incorporates a larger cooling system, which can help maintain performance during extended use, such as gaming. [23]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

6 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interaction point for any smartphone, and both the Galaxy A34 and A35 offer vibrant viewing experiences with some key distinctions.

  • Display Technology and Size: Both models feature a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080x2340 pixels), providing vivid colors and deep blacks. [1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 16, 21, 23, 33] The screen size offers an expansive viewing area for media consumption and productivity.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both displays boast a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. [1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 16, 21, 23, 33] They also offer a peak brightness of 1000 nits, ensuring good visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. [1, 2, 14, 23, 33] The Galaxy A35 introduces a variable refresh rate, which can automatically adjust between 60Hz and 120Hz to optimize battery life. [21]
  • Design and Protection: The Galaxy A34 has a notch for its front camera, while the Galaxy A35 adopts a punch-hole cutout, contributing to a more modern aesthetic and slightly smaller bezels. [4, 21, 28] As mentioned, the A35 also features the more durable Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its display, an upgrade from the A34's Gorilla Glass 5. [2, 3]

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both the Galaxy A34 and A35 are designed to capture a variety of moments, with the newer model offering some enhancements to its main sensor.

  • Rear Camera Setup: The Galaxy A34 features a triple rear camera system consisting of a 48MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. [3, 5, 14, 17, 18, 19, 30] The Galaxy A35 upgrades the main sensor to 50MP with OIS, retaining the 8MP ultrawide and 5MP macro cameras. [1, 2, 4, 12, 13, 16, 22, 25, 33]
  • Photography Performance: Both phones deliver good results in daylight, producing sharp images with decent dynamic range and Samsung's characteristic vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, colors. [1, 2, 5, 18, 21, 23, 25, 30] The OIS on the main sensor helps reduce blur, especially in challenging lighting. [30] For low-light conditions, the A35's larger main sensor and improved processing may offer slightly better performance, though some users note that low-light shots can still be blurry or noisy on both devices. [20, 25, 30] The macro lens on both is generally considered suitable for casual close-up shots. [5, 13, 20]
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: Both devices can record video at up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second (fps) with both their main rear camera and front-facing 13MP selfie camera. [1, 3, 5, 13, 18, 20, 22, 23, 26, 33] The OIS on the main camera helps keep video footage steady. [1, 26] The front camera on both is capable of capturing clear selfies and is suitable for video calls. [5, 13, 25, 30]

Main camera

48 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity: Both the Galaxy A34 and A35 support 5G connectivity, enabling faster mobile data speeds. [14, 18] They also include modern Wi-Fi standards (Wi-Fi 5 for A34, Wi-Fi 6 for A35) and Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless accessories. [14, 16, 17, 33]
  • Ports and Sensors: Both devices feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, but neither includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. [2, 3, 16, 17, 19, 31, 33] For security, both incorporate an in-display fingerprint sensor and support face recognition. [5, 14, 31]
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A34 measures 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2mm and weighs 199g. [14, 17, 29] The Galaxy A35 is slightly larger and heavier at 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2mm and 209g, partly due to its glass back. [1, 16, 21, 31] The A35's flat-sided design with rounded corners and glass back gives it a more premium feel compared to the A34's plastic construction. [2, 10, 23, 33]

Weight

199 g

209 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.6

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A34 often highlights its impressive battery life, durable design, and the value it offers with long-term software updates. [18] Some users have noted that its camera performance, particularly in challenging conditions, can be average, and the fingerprint reader can be slow. [5, 19]

The Galaxy A35 is frequently praised for its vivid display, capable main camera, and the more premium feel provided by its glass back and updated design. [1, 2, 10, 23, 24] However, some users have reported occasional performance stutters or average battery life, depending on usage patterns. [20, 23, 32, 34] While some concerns about overheating have been raised, others report good thermal management. [20, 23, 34, 35]

Users prioritizing extended software support and a slightly more robust build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ may find the Galaxy A35 to be a more suitable choice. Its updated main camera also offers a slight edge in photography. Conversely, users seeking a device that still offers strong core features, excellent battery endurance, and a durable, water-resistant design at a potentially more accessible point may lean towards the Galaxy A34. Both models represent solid options in the mid-range segment, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either device can be a sustainable choice for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons