Compare models

Galaxy A25 Vs Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 1-year minimum warranty
  • Free delivery on all orders
  • Free 30-day returns
Galaxy A25
Starting at

Refurbished price:193.00

Versus €319.11 new

See options
Galaxy Z Fold7
Starting at

Refurbished price:923.00

Versus €2,236.37 new

See options

Differences at a glance

The Samsung Galaxy A25 (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) represent two distinct approaches to modern mobile technology, catering to very different device types and user expectations. While the Galaxy A25 is a conventional mid-range smartphone built for everyday utility, the Galaxy Z Fold7 is an advanced book-style foldable device featuring dual screens and multitasking configurations. Both run on the Android operating system paired with Samsung's custom interface, though their hardware designs and target use cases sit on opposite ends of the spectrum.

Available Models

Colour

Storage (GB)

Scores

Durability

When examining software longevity and structural endurance, both devices offer multi-year support frameworks, though they differ significantly in form factor complexity.

  • Software Support: The Galaxy A25 receives up to four major Android upgrades, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold7 extends software longevity further with up to seven years of major system upgrades.
  • Structural Build: The Galaxy A25 features a traditional slate construction with a fixed plastic frame, while the Galaxy Z Fold7 utilizes a complex folding hinge mechanism and specialized folding display layers that require careful handling over extended periods of daily use.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users seeking long-term operational support will find extended relevance in the Galaxy Z Fold7's update schedule, while those choosing a quality-assured refurbished option from Back Market can secure reliable performance across both models with reduced environmental impact.

Year of Release

2023

2025

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

Processing capabilities and day-to-day responsiveness vary substantially between these models based on their hardware tiers and internal architectures.

  • Multitasking and Speed: The Galaxy Z Fold7 handles demanding applications, heavy multi-window workflows, and advanced gaming smoothly with its high-tier processor and generous RAM configurations, whereas the Galaxy A25 manages standard messaging, web browsing, and casual apps reliably with its mid-range internal hardware.
  • Storage Configurations: The Galaxy A25 typically offers configurations starting at 128GB of storage, while the Galaxy Z Fold7 begins at 256GB and scales up to higher capacities for extensive media libraries.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A25 houses a 5000mAh battery that comfortably sustains standard daily usage on a single charge, while the Galaxy Z Fold7's dual-screen setup and powerful processor require more frequent recharging under intensive multi-display workflows.

Screen quality

Display technology is one of the most defining differentiators when evaluating the visual experience of each device.

  • Display Technology: The Galaxy A25 features a single 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with clear resolution and vibrant colors, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold7 opens into an expansive 8.0-inch foldable main screen accompanied by a 6.5-inch cover display, both utilizing advanced Dynamic AMOLED panels.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both models support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling through menus, web pages, and supported applications.
  • Outdoor Visibility: The Galaxy Z Fold7 achieves higher peak brightness levels suited for clear visibility under direct sunlight, while the Galaxy A25 provides adequate brightness for typical indoor and moderate outdoor environments.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1968x2184

Audiovisual

Media capture and audio output capabilities reflect the distinct market tiers of these two Samsung devices.

  • Camera Systems: The Galaxy A25 relies on a dependable triple rear camera setup led by a 50-megapixel main sensor for everyday snapshots, while the Galaxy Z Fold7 incorporates a high-resolution 200-megapixel primary sensor alongside versatile ultra-wide and telephoto options for enhanced detail and optical zoom range.
  • Video and Low-Light: The Galaxy Z Fold7 supports higher-resolution recording formats and advanced stabilization for detailed low-light photography, whereas the Galaxy A25 handles casual video calls and standard daylight recording competently.
  • Media Consumption: The Galaxy Z Fold7 provides an immersive stereo speaker output and expansive screen space ideal for viewing media, complemented by the sustainable choice of purchasing quality-verified electronics.

Miscellaneous

Physical dimensions, connectivity standards, and daily ergonomics highlight practical handling differences.

  • Portability and Weight: The Galaxy A25 presents a standard slate profile weighing around 197 grams, while the Galaxy Z Fold7 features a slimmer folded chassis that opens into a tablet-sized form factor while weighing approximately 215 grams.
  • Connectivity: Both models support 5G networks, modern Wi-Fi standards, and Bluetooth, though the Galaxy Z Fold7 integrates newer generation wireless protocols for faster data transfer speeds.
  • Security and Authentication: The Galaxy A25 uses a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold7 provides both facial recognition and a side-mounted fingerprint scanner.

Weight

197 g

215 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

8.0

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C (USB 3)

What the community thinks

User feedback and community discussions indicate distinct patterns of praise and common concerns for both devices. Users frequently commend the Galaxy A25 for its dependable daily battery duration, straightforward usability, and reliable screen clarity within a conventional smartphone design. However, some users note that its charging speeds and processing limits are best suited for standard tasks rather than heavy gaming. On the other hand, owners of the Galaxy Z Fold7 praise its expansive unfolding workspace, top-tier multitasking capability, and bright dual-display setup. Conversely, frequent discussions highlight concerns regarding the physical presence of the screen crease, higher battery consumption during extensive dual-screen use, and the overall careful handling required for folding hardware.

Users prioritizing a straightforward, pocket-friendly device for everyday communication and media consumption will find the Galaxy A25 well-suited to their needs. Meanwhile, users prioritizing maximum workspace versatility, advanced multitasking, and a tablet-like screen experience in a portable format will lean toward the Galaxy Z Fold7. Choosing between these models depends heavily on whether a traditional smartphone format or a multi-screen foldable layout aligns closer with daily workflow demands.