Galaxy A32 5G Vs Galaxy S9

Galaxy A32 5G
Galaxy A32 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:108.00

Versus €399.00 new

See options
Galaxy S9
Galaxy S9
Starting at

Refurbished price:131.41

Versus €499.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, released in January 2021, and the Samsung Galaxy S9, launched in March 2018, represent different eras and market segments within Samsung's smartphone lineup. While the Galaxy S9 was a flagship device known for its premium features, the Galaxy A32 5G arrived as a more accessible option with modern connectivity. Key differentiators include their display technologies, camera capabilities, and overall software longevity, reflecting their respective positions in the market and technological advancements over time.

Scores

Durability

The practical lifespan of a smartphone is significantly influenced by its release date and the manufacturer's software support policy.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy S9, released in March 2018, is an older device compared to the Galaxy A32 5G, which launched in January 2021. This age difference directly impacts their remaining software support and overall practical usability.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy S9 originally launched with Android 8.0 Oreo and received its final major OS update to Android 10, with security updates concluding in April 2022. In contrast, the Galaxy A32 5G launched with Android 11 and received updates up to Android 13, with its promised four years of security updates ending in April 2025. This means the A32 5G offered a longer period of official software and security support.
  • Repairability and Build: Both devices feature durable builds, with the Galaxy A32 5G incorporating Gorilla Glass 5 for screen protection. The Galaxy S9 also used Gorilla Glass 5 for its front and back, encased in an aluminum frame, giving it a more premium feel. The availability of parts and repair services for older models can vary, but both were designed for a reasonable practical lifespan at their time of release.

Year of Release

2021

2018

Compatible with latest Update

No

No

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance between these two devices reflects the evolution of smartphone technology and their intended market segments.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy S9, as a former flagship, was equipped with a high-end processor (Exynos 9810 or Snapdragon 845 depending on region) that delivered robust performance for its time, handling demanding applications and multitasking smoothly. The Galaxy A32 5G features a MediaTek Dimensity 720 processor, which provides competent performance for everyday tasks, web browsing, and moderate gaming, but it is not designed for the same level of intensive use as a flagship processor.
  • RAM and Storage: The Galaxy S9 typically came with 4GB of RAM, with storage options up to 256GB, expandable via microSD. The Galaxy A32 5G offers more varied RAM configurations, including 4GB, 6GB, and 8GB options, alongside 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, also expandable up to 1TB with a microSD card. For users who manage many applications simultaneously, higher RAM can contribute to a smoother experience.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A32 5G is equipped with a larger 5000mAh battery, which generally translates to extended usage times, often lasting a full day or more for many users. The Galaxy S9 has a 3000mAh battery, which, while adequate for its release period, often required daily charging for moderate to heavy users. Both support 15W fast charging.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a significant point of difference, reflecting the premium positioning of the S9 versus the more budget-conscious A32 5G.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Galaxy S9 features a 5.8-inch Super AMOLED display with a high 1440x2960 (QHD+) resolution, offering deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. The Galaxy A32 5G has a larger 6.5-inch PLS TFT display with a 720x1600 (HD+) resolution. While the A32 5G's screen is larger, the S9's higher resolution and AMOLED technology provide a noticeably sharper and more vivid viewing experience.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Galaxy S9 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Galaxy A32 5G, depending on the region, can feature either a 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rate, with some US variants offering 90Hz for smoother scrolling and animations. In terms of brightness, the Super AMOLED panel of the S9 generally offers superior outdoor visibility compared to the TFT display of the A32 5G.
  • Viewing Experience: The Galaxy S9's curved display design contributes to an immersive viewing experience. While the A32 5G offers a larger screen size, the S9's display technology and higher pixel density make it more suitable for users who prioritize visual fidelity for media consumption or detailed work.

Resolution

720 x 1600

1440 x 2960

Screen type

TFT LCD

Super AMOLED

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities vary significantly between these two models, with the S9 emphasizing advanced imaging for its time and the A32 5G offering a versatile multi-lens setup.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy S9 features a single 12-megapixel rear camera with a unique variable aperture (f/1.5 and f/2.4), allowing it to adapt to different lighting conditions, excelling particularly in low-light photography. The Galaxy A32 5G boasts a quad-camera setup, including a 48MP main sensor (f/1.8), an 8MP ultrawide, a 5MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. While the A32 5G offers more lens options, the S9's main camera often delivers superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting.
  • Photography Performance: The S9 was praised for its fast focus, accurate exposure, and strong dynamic range, producing bright and natural-looking colors. Its low-light performance was a key highlight, with multi-frame noise reduction reducing grain. The A32 5G's main camera performs respectably in good lighting, but its ultrawide and macro lenses can be less consistent, and low-light performance is generally not as strong as the S9.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The Galaxy S9 supports 4K video recording at up to 60 frames per second and features super slow-motion video at 960fps. It has an 8MP front camera. The Galaxy A32 5G can record 4K video at 30fps and has a 13MP front camera. The S9's video capabilities, particularly its higher frame rates and slow-motion features, were more advanced for its release.

Main camera

48 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance, several practical elements differentiate these devices in daily use.

  • Connectivity: A major distinction is 5G capability, which is present in the Galaxy A32 5G, offering faster mobile data speeds where available. The Galaxy S9 is limited to 4G LTE networks. Both support Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.
  • Ports and Sensors: Both phones include a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and notably, both retain a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Galaxy S9 features a rear-mounted fingerprint sensor, face unlock, and an iris scanner for biometric security. The Galaxy A32 5G opts for a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Dimensions and Build Materials: The Galaxy S9 is more compact and lighter, measuring 147.7 x 68.7 x 8.5mm and weighing 163g, with a premium glass and aluminum construction. The Galaxy A32 5G is larger and heavier at 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1mm and 205g, featuring a plastic back and frame. This difference impacts in-hand feel and portability.

Weight

205 g

163 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

5.8

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

User sentiment for the Galaxy S9 often highlighted its exceptional camera, particularly its low-light performance and variable aperture, as a significant draw. Its premium design and vibrant Super AMOLED display were also frequently praised. However, a common criticism revolved around its battery life, with many users finding it necessary to charge the device daily. The Galaxy A32 5G, on the other hand, received positive feedback for its impressive battery longevity and the inclusion of 5G connectivity at a more accessible point. Its performance was generally considered good for everyday tasks, though some users noted the display's lower resolution as a drawback and found the secondary cameras to be less impactful than the main sensor.

Users prioritizing a premium build, a superior display for media, and advanced camera capabilities, especially in varied lighting conditions, may find the Galaxy S9 more aligned with their preferences. Conversely, individuals who value extended battery life, modern 5G connectivity, and a larger screen for general use, and who are less concerned with peak display resolution or flagship-level camera performance, might lean towards the Galaxy A32 5G. Both devices offer distinct advantages, catering to different user needs. For those considering an eco-friendly alternative, quality-assured refurbished options for both models are available, providing a sustainable choice for extending the life of these devices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons