Galaxy A25 Vs Galaxy A34

Galaxy A25
Galaxy A25
Starting at

Refurbished price:134.00

Versus €319.11 new

See options
Galaxy A34
Galaxy A34
Starting at

Refurbished price:135.00

Versus €399.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A25, released in December 2023, and the Samsung Galaxy A34, launched in March 2023, are both mid-range Android smartphones from Samsung's popular A-series. While they share a similar design philosophy and operate on the Android platform, the A25 offers a slightly newer processor and retains a traditional audio jack, whereas the A34 distinguishes itself with an official dust and water resistance rating.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release timelines, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy A34 was released in March 2023, making it approximately three years old at the current date. The Galaxy A25, launched in December 2023, is about two and a half years old. This difference means the A25 will likely receive software updates for a slightly longer period from the current date.
  • Software Support: Both models are part of Samsung's commitment to providing four generations of Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates. Given their respective launch dates, the Galaxy A25 will benefit from software support extending further into the future compared to the Galaxy A34.
  • Durability Features: The Galaxy A34 features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 on its display for enhanced scratch resistance and boasts an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing it to withstand immersion in up to 1 meter of fresh water for 30 minutes. The Galaxy A25 also features Gorilla Glass 5 for screen protection. However, while some sources indicate water resistance for the A25, it does not carry an official IP rating, meaning it is not designed for the same level of water immersion protection as the A34.

Year of Release

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to multitasking and gaming. Both the Galaxy A25 and A34 are equipped to handle typical mid-range demands.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A25 is powered by a capable mid-range processor, which allows for smooth navigation through apps and efficient handling of everyday tasks. The Galaxy A34 features an efficient mid-range processor that provides a responsive user experience, suitable for general use and moderate gaming.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices offer configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, facilitating effective multitasking and app switching. They also come with 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD card, providing ample space for applications, photos, and media.
  • Battery Life: Both smartphones are equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, designed to provide extended usage. The Galaxy A25 can comfortably last a full day of typical use, with some reviewers noting impressive video streaming endurance. The Galaxy A34 is also noted for its strong battery performance, often lasting more than two days on a single charge for some users.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

6 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for any smartphone, and both the Galaxy A25 and A34 offer vibrant viewing experiences.

  • Display Technology and Size: Both models feature a Super AMOLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Galaxy A25 has a 6.5-inch display, while the Galaxy A34 offers a slightly larger 6.6-inch screen. Both displays have a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, ensuring clear and detailed visuals.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both screens achieve a peak brightness of 1000 nits, which contributes to good outdoor visibility, even in bright conditions. They also support a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a smoother scrolling experience and more fluid animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
  • Design Elements: Both devices incorporate a notch design for the front-facing camera, which slightly intrudes into the display area.

Resolution

1080x2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super AMOLED

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a significant factor in smartphone choice. Both the Galaxy A25 and A34 offer versatile camera setups.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy A25 features a triple rear camera setup, including a 50 MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), an 8 MP ultrawide lens, and a 2 MP macro lens. The Galaxy A34 also has a triple rear camera system, comprising a 48 MP main sensor with OIS, an 8 MP ultrawide lens, and a 5 MP macro lens.
  • Photography Performance: The main camera on the Galaxy A25 performs well in good lighting conditions, capturing decent detail and color, and can even handle dimly lit indoor areas effectively. However, its peripheral cameras, particularly the 2 MP macro, are considered less capable. The Galaxy A34's main camera also produces good images with natural colors and clarity in daylight, and its Night Mode is noted as above average for its category.
  • Video and Front Camera: The Galaxy A25 can record 4K video at 30 frames per second (fps) with its rear camera and 1080p at 30fps with its 13 MP front camera. The Galaxy A34 supports 4K video recording at 30fps for both its rear and 13 MP front cameras.

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Bluetooth 5.3, ensuring modern wireless communication standards. The Galaxy A25 includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature absent on the Galaxy A34. Both utilize a USB-C 2.0 port for charging and data transfer.
  • Biometrics and Design: The Galaxy A25 features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button. The Galaxy A34 opts for an under-display optical fingerprint sensor. Both phones have a glass front (Gorilla Glass 5) and a plastic back and frame.
  • Physical Attributes: The Galaxy A25 measures 162.1 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm and weighs 197g. The Galaxy A34 is slightly different at 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm and weighs 199g. These dimensions indicate a similar form factor and handling experience.

Weight

197 g

199 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.6

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

Both the Samsung Galaxy A25 and Galaxy A34 present compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, each with distinct advantages that cater to different user preferences. User feedback for the Galaxy A25 often praises its vibrant display, reliable performance for everyday use, and commendable battery life. Its main camera is generally well-regarded, and the commitment to long-term software support is a significant plus. However, some users note that its secondary cameras are less impressive, and the overall build, while sturdy, is primarily plastic.

The Galaxy A34 receives acclaim for its excellent Super AMOLED display, robust main camera performance, and the assurance of extended software updates. Users also appreciate its loud speakers and strong battery endurance. Common criticisms include a slower in-display fingerprint reader and the absence of a charger in the box. Some opinions on camera color reproduction vary, with some finding them oversaturated and others noting a lack of richness.

Users prioritizing a slightly newer device with a traditional headphone jack may find the Galaxy A25 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value an official IP67 dust and water resistance rating and a slightly larger screen might lean towards the Galaxy A34. Both devices offer solid performance for their category, making them suitable for students, professionals, and travelers seeking a dependable smartphone. For those considering a quality-assured refurbished option, both models are available, providing an eco-friendly alternative to new purchases.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons