Galaxy A16 Vs Galaxy A23 5G

Galaxy A16
Galaxy A16
Starting at

Refurbished price:134.00

Versus €250.00 new

See options
Galaxy A23 5G
Galaxy A23 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:102.00

Versus €600.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (released in late 2024) and the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (released in late 2022) are both mid-range smartphones from Samsung's A-series, designed to offer a balance of features and accessibility. While they share a similar design philosophy and run on the Android operating system with Samsung's One UI, key differences lie in their display technology, camera capabilities, and long-term software support.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are important factors. The Galaxy A16, being a newer model, benefits from an extended support window compared to its predecessor.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy A16 was released in October 2024, while the Galaxy A23 5G debuted in August 2022. This two-year difference directly impacts their remaining support lifespans.
  • OS Support Duration: The Galaxy A16 is notable for its commitment to six years of Android OS upgrades and six years of security updates, with support expected to cease around October 2030. The Galaxy A23 5G, having launched earlier, typically receives fewer major Android updates, with its initial OS being Android 12 and currently running Android 14.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing the longest possible software and security support will find the Galaxy A16 more aligned with their needs, ensuring the device remains current and secure for an extended period. The Galaxy A23 5G, while still receiving updates, will reach its end-of-support sooner.

Year of Release

2024

2022

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both smartphones are equipped to handle daily tasks, but their internal components offer varying levels of responsiveness and efficiency for different usage patterns.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A16 features a more recent processor, such as the MediaTek Helio G99 in its 4G variant or the Exynos 1330/Dimensity 6300 in its 5G variant, providing smooth navigation and efficient handling of common applications. The Galaxy A23 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, which delivers reliable performance for everyday use and moderate multitasking.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices offer various RAM configurations, typically ranging from 4GB to 8GB, allowing for comfortable multitasking. Storage options for both include 128GB, with the Galaxy A16 also offering a 256GB variant, and both support expandable storage via a microSD card, providing ample space for apps and media.
  • Battery Behavior: Both phones are equipped with a 5000mAh battery, supporting 25W fast charging. This large capacity generally translates to a full day of use for most users, with the fast charging capability allowing for quicker power top-ups.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on these devices differs primarily in their display technology and refresh rates, impacting overall clarity and smoothness.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy A16 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast. In contrast, the Galaxy A23 5G comes with a 6.6-inch PLS LCD screen, which offers good color reproduction and viewing angles.
  • Resolution and Refresh Rate: Both phones provide a Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 for A16, 1080 x 2408 for A23 5G), ensuring sharp visuals for content consumption. The Galaxy A16 offers a 90Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations, while the Galaxy A23 5G steps up with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing an even more fluid visual experience.
  • Brightness and Protection: The Galaxy A16's Super AMOLED display can reach up to 800 nits in high brightness mode, making it suitable for outdoor visibility. The Galaxy A23 5G's display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5, offering enhanced durability against scratches and drops.

Resolution

1080x2340

1080 x 2408

Screen type

Super AMOLED

PLS LCD

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer versatile camera systems designed to capture a variety of moments, though with some distinctions in their advanced features.

  • Rear Camera System: Both the Galaxy A16 and Galaxy A23 5G feature a 50MP main camera, capable of capturing detailed images in good lighting conditions. The Galaxy A23 5G's main camera includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), which helps in reducing blur from handshakes, particularly in challenging lighting or when recording video. The Galaxy A16 relies on Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for video on its 4G variant. Both also include a 5MP ultrawide lens and a 2MP macro lens for diverse photographic perspectives.
  • Front Camera and Video Quality: For selfies, the Galaxy A16 is equipped with a 13MP front camera, while the Galaxy A23 5G has an 8MP front camera. The Galaxy A16 5G variant supports UHD 4K video recording at 30 frames per second, whereas the Galaxy A23 5G records video at FHD (1080p) at 30 frames per second.
  • Audio Experience: Both devices offer a 3.5mm headphone jack, providing a traditional option for audio connectivity. Speaker output is generally suitable for media consumption and calls.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A16 (5G variant) and Galaxy A23 5G support 5G connectivity, enabling faster mobile data speeds where available. They also include Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac and Bluetooth for wireless connections. Both devices utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer.
  • Security and Sensors: Both smartphones feature fingerprint sensors for secure unlocking and authentication. The Galaxy A16 also has an IP54 rating, indicating a degree of protection against dust and splashes, enhancing its durability in various environments.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A16 measures 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.9 mm and weighs 200g, while the Galaxy A23 5G is slightly larger at 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm and weighs 197g. These dimensions suggest a comfortable handling experience for devices with large displays.

Weight

200 g

197 g

Screen size (in)

6.7

6.6

Network

4G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

User sentiment for both the Galaxy A16 and Galaxy A23 5G generally highlights their strengths as accessible mid-range devices. For the Galaxy A16, common praise points include its vibrant Super AMOLED display and the significant commitment to long-term software updates, which users appreciate for extending the device's usable life. The inclusion of an IP54 rating for dust and splash resistance is also a noted advantage for everyday durability. Some users, however, might find the 90Hz refresh rate, while smooth, not as fluid as higher refresh rate displays.

The Galaxy A23 5G is often lauded for its 120Hz refresh rate, providing a very smooth visual experience, and the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in its main camera, which is a valuable feature for clearer photos and more stable videos. However, some user reviews have mentioned concerns about potential performance lags or heating issues under heavy use, and its PLS LCD screen, while good, may not offer the same contrast as an AMOLED panel.

Users prioritizing extended software support and a vibrant Super AMOLED display may find the Galaxy A16 to be a suitable choice. Its IP54 rating also adds a layer of practical durability. Conversely, users who prioritize an exceptionally smooth display experience with a 120Hz refresh rate and enhanced camera stability through OIS might lean towards the Galaxy A23 5G. Both devices offer a large battery capacity for sustained use. For those seeking an eco-friendly alternative, considering quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide a sustainable choice without compromising on functionality.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons