Galaxy A56 Vs Google Pixel 7A

Galaxy A56
Galaxy A56
Starting at

Refurbished price:294.00

Versus €502.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 7A
Google Pixel 7A
Starting at

Refurbished price:172.00

Versus €649.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A56, released in March 2025, and the Google Pixel 7a, launched in May 2023, are both mid-range smartphones running on the Android operating system. While the Galaxy A56 offers a larger display and extended software support, the Pixel 7a is recognized for its compact form factor and advanced camera capabilities. Both devices aim to provide a balanced smartphone experience for everyday users.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and repairability. These two devices present different profiles in these aspects.

  • Release Timeline & Software Support: The Galaxy A56, being a newer device from March 2025, benefits from a longer support window, offering six major Android OS upgrades and seven years of security updates, extending until March 2032. In contrast, the Pixel 7a, released in May 2023, is guaranteed five years of OS and security updates, concluding in May 2028. This difference means the Galaxy A56 will receive software updates for a significantly longer period.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A56 has a repairability score of 8.4 out of 10, indicating it is relatively repair-friendly, though slightly less so than its predecessor. The Pixel 7a initially received a lower repairability score of 4/10, which was later uprated to 5/10 after Google provided a comprehensive service manual, suggesting a fair level of repairability for users who prefer to fix their devices.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users can expect the Galaxy A56 to remain current with software features and security patches for a more extended duration due to its newer release and longer support policy. The Pixel 7a, while still receiving updates, will reach its end-of-life for major OS upgrades sooner, potentially impacting its long-term usability for those who prioritize the latest software.

Year of Release

2025

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both the Galaxy A56 and the Pixel 7a are equipped with processors designed to handle daily tasks and demanding applications, though they approach performance with different underlying hardware.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A56 is powered by a current-generation Exynos 1580 processor, which users report provides smooth operation, efficient multitasking, and capable gaming performance with effective thermal management. The Pixel 7a features Google's Tensor G2 chip, enabling seamless multitasking and responsive app loading, even for graphically intensive games. Both processors are designed to deliver a fluid user experience in their respective ecosystems.
  • Storage and RAM: The Galaxy A56 offers configurations with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card up to 1TB. The Pixel 7a comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, but it does not support expandable storage. This means users with extensive media libraries or numerous applications might find the Galaxy A56's expandable storage a practical advantage.
  • Overall System Responsiveness: User feedback indicates that both devices offer a responsive experience. The Galaxy A56 is noted for its optimized software, which contributes to a smooth feel in general use and reduced lag in applications like the camera. The Pixel 7a's integration of its processor with the Android operating system also results in a fast and fluid interface, making everyday interactions quick and efficient.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both smartphones is a key consideration, with differences in display technology, size, and refresh rates impacting daily use.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy A56 features a larger 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks, suitable for immersive media consumption. The Pixel 7a has a more compact 6.1-inch OLED display, which also delivers rich colors and strong contrast, appealing to users who prefer a smaller device for one-handed use.
  • Resolution and Brightness: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolution, ensuring sharp and clear visuals for text and images. The Galaxy A56's display can reach a peak brightness of up to 1900 nits, providing excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. The Pixel 7a's display also offers sufficient brightness for outdoor use, though it may not reach the same peak levels as the A56.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Galaxy A56 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to exceptionally smooth scrolling and fluid animations, enhancing the overall user interface experience. The Pixel 7a features a 90Hz refresh rate, which still provides a noticeably smoother experience compared to standard 60Hz displays, making interactions feel more responsive.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

OLED

Audiovisual

Photography and videography capabilities are often a deciding factor for smartphone users, and both the Galaxy A56 and Pixel 7a offer distinct camera experiences.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy A56 is equipped with a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization, a 12MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro camera. It is noted for producing excellent daylight photos with accurate colors and good dynamic range, as well as strong video performance and selfies. The Pixel 7a features a dual-camera system with a 64MP main sensor and a 13MP ultrawide lens, both with optical image stabilization. Its camera is highly praised for delivering exceptional photos with natural yet vibrant color reproduction and strong detail in various lighting conditions, often compared favorably to higher-end devices.
  • Low-Light and Video Quality: Both devices perform well in low-light scenarios, with the Pixel 7a particularly noted for its Night Sight mode and ability to capture detailed images in dim conditions. The Galaxy A56 also takes good nighttime photos, especially when its automatic Night mode activates. For video recording, both phones offer 4K resolution at 30 frames per second, with the Galaxy A56 also supporting 1080p at 60fps, and the Pixel 7a offering up to 240fps for slow-motion capture.
  • Front Camera and Audio: The Galaxy A56 includes a 12MP front camera, capable of excellent selfies. The Pixel 7a features a 13MP front camera, also delivering quality self-portraits. Both phones provide stereo speaker output, with the Galaxy A56's speakers noted for being clear and loud with minimal distortion. The Pixel 7a's audio experience is also generally well-regarded for media consumption.

Main camera

4K@30fps

64 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A56 and Pixel 7a support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The Galaxy A56 includes Wi-Fi and GPS, while the Pixel 7a offers Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 for enhanced wireless performance. Both devices utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer. The Pixel 7a also includes NFC for contactless payments.
  • Sensors and Security: For biometric security, the Galaxy A56 features an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock. The Pixel 7a also offers both face recognition and an in-display fingerprint sensor, providing convenient unlocking options. Both phones include standard sensors such as an accelerometer, ambient light sensor, and gyroscope.
  • Build Materials and Durability: The Galaxy A56 features an aluminum frame with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, contributing to a premium feel and enhanced durability. The Pixel 7a uses an aluminum frame with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 on the front and a back made from recycled glass and plastics. Both devices carry an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering protection against splashes and submersion.
  • Dimensions and Handling: The Galaxy A56 measures 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm and weighs 198 grams, offering a larger footprint. The Pixel 7a is more compact at 152.4 x 72.9 x 9.0 mm and weighs 193 grams, making it easier for one-handed operation for some users.

Weight

197 g

193 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A56 and Google Pixel 7a cater to slightly different user preferences within the mid-range smartphone market. User feedback for the Galaxy A56 often praises its long-lasting battery, vibrant and large 120Hz display, and extended software support, making it a reliable choice for those who prioritize media consumption and device longevity. Some users, however, note the absence of wireless charging and the slight decrease in repairability compared to its predecessor.

The Pixel 7a receives consistent acclaim for its exceptional camera performance, often rivaling more expensive devices, and its compact design. Its clean Android experience and timely updates are also frequently highlighted as strengths. Criticisms sometimes point to its battery life, which some users find requires more frequent charging, and the lack of expandable storage.

Users prioritizing a larger, smoother display, superior battery endurance, and a longer software update commitment may find the Galaxy A56 more aligned with their needs. Conversely, individuals who value a highly capable camera in a more compact form factor, along with a pure Android experience and wireless charging, might lean towards the Pixel 7a. Both devices offer robust performance for everyday tasks, making the choice dependent on specific user priorities. For those considering a sustainable choice, both models are available as quality-assured refurbished options, extending their lifecycle and reducing electronic waste.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons